You came to your price: Dr. Jahn Gir Hasan

Dr. Jahn Gir Hasan

Undoubtedly, the identity and confirmation of voters is very important. But the question is whether this process is necessary before the same election? There are about 8 million voters in the state of Bihar who are to be identified and confirmed, can this process be completed in a month of a month? The 11 documents that the Election Commission has accepted is estimated by the Election Commission, which is estimated by people of about 2.5 decisions, so voters do not have the necessary documents and cannot present on time, but they would have given the right to use their names? So why?

And if it is maintained, why is it necessary to hurry and hurry this identity? Then the aadhaarcard that has been made by the government, and even today, the post office and other recognized centers have been born buy and amened to make amendments, and from the shop to the house, from the house, from the shop to the hoo Industry, from the school to the school, from the school to the school, from the school to the school, to the school, to the school, from the school to the school, to the school, from the school to the school to the school, to the school, to the school. Why does the Election Commission not get the privilege of acceptance? Election Commission is also understood, why?

In addition, the Election Commission has released a decree to identify voters and determine some time, and its intention seems clear. At the same time, with the arrival of new announcements by the Election Commission in the coming days, the doubts of the residents are also strengthened that the identity of voters is an excuse.

This is why political and social status is being created on the identity and verification of recent voters, and protests and political and social supervisors are accused of impartially intended to the Election Commission. In fact, some people also believe that this process of the Election Commission is against the Constitution. Along with this, opposition leaders and some NGOs filed a case in the Supreme Court on July 7, 2025, which expressed concern that the special review process of the Election Commission could be removed from the names of voters and voters, and the names of voters were rejected by the voters. Add to the desired document.

It should be noted that the opposition objected on the first day why the Election Commission is demanding documents demanding voters that they do not have and why they are not doing why voters do not have documents. Justice itself says, “If you ask me for these documents, I will not be able to show me.” It is also said that when a judge is not enough to show the necessary documents, where and how can the common people and the common people look like? At the same time, the Supreme Court also raised three important questions before the Election Commission.

(1) Does the Election Commission have the right to review or not? (2) What is the basis of the style of Election Commission? (3) Why is a special review being done before selection? To answer all these questions, the Supreme Court has approved the Election Commission by 21 July and fixed the next hearing on 28 July. The final question has been increasing the opposition and journalism since the last 15-16, but still, the Supreme Court has not been responded to by the Election Commission. What is the real truth behind all these malicious events, it should be considered as a public interest.

Also, when the Supreme Court asked the Commission, why was the Aadhaar card, etc. not accepted? In response, the Commission said that the Aadhaar corridor itself does not have a privilege of citizenship. To this, the court said that there is no marching and no birth certificate. Then if the base is so incredible, then why is it mentioned in the principles of the Election Commission?

In addition, till yesterday it was stated by the Election Commission that Form 6 was accepted to join the voter list and become voters and the process was accepted in this process. So why is it being accepted today, what is the purpose behind it? Along with this, the judicial bench also sought an explanation that what would happen to it if God was living for any reason? Will the name be listed in the voter or will it be left? But after hearing all the words of the Commission, the Supreme Court clearly expressed doubt that everything was not going well.

However, since the Election Commission has made a special review, there has been no obligatory response from the Commission till the Supreme Court hearing, and the example of this is being reviewed in a suspicious way, has never been revealed before today. But the recent hearing of the Supreme Court has raised the hope that there will be no injustice for voters in the voting case and no one will be allowed to lose the right to vote, on the other hand, the Election Commission’s malpractice has also appeared and it has been opposed to the opposition. It is also important and interesting to see that on July 28, what will be the case in this Supreme Court case?

[email protected]