By the grace of Allah, Pakistan defeated India in four days of Pak -India war. The whole world is accepted and recognized.
The US President, Donald Trump, has announced more than a dozen times, the assembly has announced that his efforts and massage have stopped the Pak -India war. The next day, Trump also admitted that four, five modern warfare aircraft (Pak Air Force) were killed in the war (India). France (which has provided Komia Nazi Rafael aircraft) has admitted that the Pakistani Air Force has killed India’s Rafael. India, however, did not believe in ego and insult.
Modi ji is calling in a state of insult, but is not denying the words of the US President. Modi’s fire has led to the concerns of many waves in the atmosphere of Pak -India peace. The fire of the Indian Prime Minister has thwarted Pakistan’s peace efforts.
There are signs of clouds on the atmosphere of Pakistan and India. Parties are upset. The question is, how can Pakistan be honored with this horrific situation? The answer to this question has emerged in a diverse way. One of the answers to this question is given by a single prominent intellectuals, Mr. Yusuf Naazar. Shri Yusuf Naazar is primarily a world -scrutiny, but his views on his economic experiences are also based on global politics and global conflicts.
The narrator wrote a detailed article in English in Pakistan last week. He has told the readers that Pakistan can get out of the present (Pak -India tension) crisis, provided Pakistan should learn from its long and tried friends, China’s central policy. And according to the author, this central thinking of China is a “non -qualified policy”. Without agreeing with Joseph’s views, it can be said that many points are considered in his proposal.
Joseph Nazar writes: “China’s long -lengthless non -prostrate has helped to become a global economic power by lifting it from the rubble of colonial exploitation. Cold War, Syria and Ukraine’s proxy struggle of wars, or recent South China Sea stress, always avoid long military confusion.
China’s cautious response during the ongoing trade war with the United States (including limited tariffs, appeals to the World Trade Organization, and the silence of the business partners) is the reflection of the same policy. Beijing has given priority to internal stability, economic self -promotion and diplomatic link instead of increasing stress. For Pakistan, this behavior offers a powerful model. Ben -Doodoli relations are not determined only by ideas, as it shows a deep friendship between Pakistan and China. China has been able to establish a strong partnership, despite being a non -relevant and undemocratic state, and Pakistan, despite being an Islamic Republic.
The fact shows that practical policies can be beyond ideological differences. Pakistan today stands at a decisive turn: its future depends on whether it can be honored with the legacy of Pak -India struggle that has sucked its resources, prevented economic development and has given rise to instability? The story of Chinese development is a lesson for Pakistan. China removed 80 million citizens from poverty and turned into a global economic power, focused on foreign conflicts and focused on internal stability. Pakistan should focus on its internal development in the same way.
The separation of Bangladesh in the 1971 war was a national tragedy. Thousands of lives were destroyed in the tragedy and 20 % of GDP ended. Pakistan’s participation in the Afghan war led to terrorist attacks in Pakistan, in which more than 80,000 people have been destroyed. Various governments of Pakistan have also accepted this great loss of life. ,
Joseph Nazar further writes: “In such a background, China’s non -influential strategy, which prefers internal development, is a clear lesson for Pakistan. China’s non -made policy is based on” five principles of peace -co -existence “in 1954, to avoid China’s sovereignty,” respect for centrality, and non -contains. Protection of sovereignty and prevention of external conflicts should be protected.
Mao Tung focused on internal stability, while Deng Shiao Ping made the non -Crandam strategy a source of complete development through economic reforms in the late 1970s. Darsh’s philosophy “hide your abilities and wait for time”. “On many occasions in the history of China, the policy of non-carriage was clearly visible, such as limited participation in the Korean war, the Vietnam avoids direct interference in the war, and the China-Vietnam War of freedom, freedom, freedom, freedom, freedom, freedom. War, War, Rwanda massacre, Iraq and Libya’s struggle also remained the role of China.
The economic reforms of 1978 doubled rural revenue, dramatically increased education, and progress in scientific research made artificial intelligence, 5G and biotechnology possible. China banned military expenses. In 2023, only 1.67 percent of GDP, while countries like the United States and Russia have lost their resources in their resources. China prefers diplomacy on tension in the Mediterranean South China, which is an expression of military conflict prevention strategy.
In contrast, the United States lost trillion dollars in Iraq and Afghanistan, while China promoted trade stability. For Pakistan, China’s model offers a clear way: avoiding conflicts, using resources on internal development, and investing in education, health and industry. If Pakistan adopts this route, it can achieve economic development and stability. The development of China is proof that internal stability and focus on development are more powerful than conflict. Pakistan should take only one way so that development can become its fate. ,
Joseph Nazar can be called advice of such intellectuals, but it is not easy to follow them in the moment of current Pak -India stress. But what is the problem? Sometimes, light can also be obtained from “demand”. In the last two weeks, adverse suggestions that provoke India Pakistan, such suggestions are probably notable for Pakistan in such an environment. After them, perhaps Pakistan’s weakness should be included. The most prominent Muslim intellectuals, thinkers, commentators and writers of many books, Pakistan and Pakistanis, have been given such advice on the “non -popular” policy.
This advice, but, could not be accepted in Pakistan. Yusuf Nazar Sahib and Maulana Wahiduddin Khan do not give such suggestions to India and Indians. It is India that conducts terrorism in Pakistan through Afghanistan and sometimes heats bloodshed in Pakistan through bla and bra through such terrorists. If India’s opponents -Pakistan devils are low, then may cross the atmosphere of peace in South Asia.