China warned of increasing use of biometric data by Crypto-Linked Projects, which cautions scanning programs working under the guise of digital asset distrust security.
In a public safety bulletin published on Wednesday, the Chinese State Security Ministry (MSS) underlined several emerging risks associated with biometric recognition technologies, including facial fingerprints and IRIS data collections.
The MSS cited an unknown foreign company that, “under the guise of issuing cryptocurrency tokens, scanned from users worldwide and transferred collective iris information and then data source.” Officials said that it posted “the threat to personal information security and even national security”.
This reference indicates Sam Altman’s world, which is known to collect Irana data in exchange for its world (WLD) tokens globally. For its website, the World has operated in 160 counties, when China is not one of them.
Connected: Crypto loans were rebuilt using the world ID of Sam Altman on divine research issues
Iris data leaks are irreversible
The MSS described IRIS recognition as a high-primary biometric method, usually used in sensitive areas. These characteristics also make it an attractive goal for misuse. Once a compromise, it is almost impossible to change such biometric “keys”.
Facial identity was also flagged as an important concept. Bulletin warns, “Inappropriate storage of relevant data can be leaked, which not only endanger personal privacy and proper security, but also a threat to governance.”
Authorities misused the facial data to espionless operations of foreign intelligence agencies, including infiltration of major workplaces.
“While the biometric identification feature, the notice concluded,” We should share the congratulations for its safety when providing personal biometric inflation. “
Connected: World series launched equipment to prioritize real humans on bots
Vitalik proposes a pluralist digital ID to protect privacy
In June, Vitallic Butterin proposed a new concept, called a pluralistic identity, aimed at protection privacy and inclusive identity. The Ethereum co-founder expressed concern that the privacy-focused system using zero-knowledge (ZK) evidence can also increase the risk iforce rigid, a
Baterin warned that a single, trackable ID requirement melts the name pseudonym and expose or employ individuals to monitor governments. He also dismissed the “proof of weight” as a proper verification method, arguing that they are in favor of rich and excluded people.
As a solution, butterin supported the outline of the pluralistic identity, where the verification comes from a combination of sources, such as governments, social networks or community-operated systems, to gain dominance to any one.
magazine: AI secretly to love owls … or Hitler. Meta + AI Porn?
