The biggest perfection of democracy is that it not only gives a slogan to accountability. But when the Prime Minister himself is absent from Parliament, when the most important and sensitive issues of the country are discussed in the lower house. Therefore, the question is not just the dignity of democracy. The issue has been allowed to come under pressure to protest against this issue under very sensitive and international discussion. This is not just that when the Opposition wants to justify the government for national security, foreign policy and military operations, the country’s top -elected representative has already created absentee programs.
Operation sender, after the first gum attack, is a step that has been erased not only in the country but also globally. On 22 April, 25 tourists and a local person were killed by Indian forces in a terrorist attack by Indian forces on military goals in the Pakistan border and declared a “reaction defense campaign”. After that, political statements in the domestic environment and the intensity of national security issues were that the logical result was that the Prime Minister himself would face all the questions in the House. But the question is whether Narendra Modi wants to face unexpected or unpleasant questions by bringing himself in an atmosphere of such democratic dialogue? In today’s party meeting, Parliamentary Affairs Minister, Kiran Rijiju said that the government is ready to debate the operation sender. But the question is when the Prime Minister is not present? Rijiju himself also hoped the opposition that there was no obstruction in the proceedings of the meeting.
Even if there is a debate, its direction and its results will be fixed in advance, that is, there may be a question, but there is no answer. In such a case, it is necessary for the opposition to have a serious and direct interaction in Parliament on all these issues. However, the government approved the debate on Cloud, just one point, operation, while no decision on the alleged manipulation on the electoral rolls, it became clear that it wants to highlight and cover it.
Congress leader Pramod Tiwari has asked the question that when the Prime Minister knew that he would be out of the country on these dates, then why was the meeting asked?
This truth becomes even more serious when the public sees that a person seen on every road during the election goes behind the screen when a person intends to respond to the sensitive issues of the country. This attitude is not only regrets, but also a democratic leadership. In the absence of the Prime Minister, the ministers participating in the debate will play only an exhibition role, while the real intellectual and moral leadership questions will remain. The session is also considered important as this is the first meeting after which the movement to remove Justice Verma has been supported by more than 100 members, and the opposition has questioned the issue of court issues and issue of issue. Leadership is now limited to image opportunities, global tourism and election rallies?
The spirit of democracy is a reliable relationship between the question and the answer. If the Prime Minister himself is breaking the relationship with absent, the presence of the rest of the government is only a formal action. Operation sender is not only a military campaign, but its success or failure will be assessed not only from the battlefield but also from the answers given in Parliament. And when the same answer is absent, this action becomes a question, ‘One question that the house is not answered.
[email protected]
Click here to join us on social media. Click 👉 https://bit.ly/folkrrs