Table of Contents
key takeaways
-
Crypto explorer Zachxbt criticized the token2049 for poor sponsor veating, warning that platinum sponsorship is not equal to validity. He took out many sponsors to make shady records.
-
JPEX and Hypervers have used the event sponsorship that projects reliability. The two later fell under the investigation into fraud, causing billions in the loss and arrest of the investor.
-
The red flag consists of anonymous team, low liquidity, overhending marketing, poor tokenomics and listing only on unclear exchange.
-
These coins do not have innovation, but speculation, inflices buzz and cult-like following, explaining how unpredictability affects their existence.
In the unexpected cryptocurrency market, some digital assets exist despite facing disputes, significant value falls or lacks sufficiently underlying value. Although shady is trapped in coins, they continue considering interest from dedicated followers. This continuous engagement is often powered by speculative enthusiasm, strong community support and rapid profits.
Zachxbt, a well -known Crypto Sleep, created some sponsors of a major crypto phenomenon token2049 through their telegram channel. He felt that the organizers of such events work very little on their sponsors and a project is a platinum sponsor that cannot increase unreliability. He was posting a sketch token on his channel about 2049 sponsors.
This article explains why some coins demonstrate benning sketching to a remarkable person. It discusses five shady coins that attract crypto investors and examine the causes of their long -Hindi. It will also explain how novice traders can protect from such projects.
Why shady coins survive despite obstacles
Despite weak basic things, the cryptocurrency of many questions remains in the market. While most fails quickly, some survive due to specific factors or thrive in short. This includes:
-
Speculative trade: Risk traders seeking quick profits in the flow of sharp value are attracted.
-
Dedicated Community: The supporters of loyal, often operated by memes or apathy, keep these projects alive.
-
Low market liquidity: Limited business activity allows large investors or investors to draw in bookies, affecting prices.
-
Periodic publicity: Social media trends, inflices and unexpected news may temporarily promote interested in these coins.
Do you know From “1,000x guaranteed returns” to “satellite-draped DEFI”, scam projects often use attractive narratives to hook traders. When the climb is bold without evidence, coins are like sketches.
5 shady coins refuse to die
Zachxbt discussed some sponsors of token2049, which is an individual with unexpected crypto market details opaque operation. He has mentioned the following coins as a sketch:
Spacecraft
-
Original: Launched by Gluva in 2024–2025 and the title sponsor of token2049, Spacecoin is aimed at the world’s first decentralized physical infrastructure network (DepIPIN), run by satellites. It claims that its decentralized satellite network will provide a global 5G internet to 2.9 billion people who currently have access to access to the whole world.
-
Controversy: Onchain explorer zachxbt labeed spaceoin as “bottled” and incredible, questioning its validity. While bottles can be interpreted in many ways, no meaning is flattering.
-
Why suspect: There are concerts around the spacecraft. For example, in June 2022, it claimed that without naming a special audit firm, undergoing several months of treatment and smart contact auditing, and no public reports were provided. In addition, there is no verification document about the launch of satellites.
-
What is this: Strong propaganda efforts with a dedicated community and media attacks, phenomenon sponsorship and speculative interest, keeping limited business activation alive.
Zucoin
-
Original: Jucoin, the first Jubi, is established a single-based cryptocurrency exchange in 2013, with its tokens and cedefi services to expand its ecosystem by 2025.
-
Controversy: Zachxbt marked Jucouin as the “sketch” platinum sponsor of the token2049, citing the history of deteriorating changes, rebrands and regulatory pivotes.
-
Why suspect: There is a lack of regulation in major markets in Zukkin, when he has applied for a license in Taiwan. The project is not regulated in the US, the European Union or other major markets have habit regulatory standards in addition to the monetary authority of Singapore.
-
What is this: An aggressive marketing drive for speculation and trading action around the tokens.
Wax
-
Original: Weex 2018 is a single-related crypto futures platforming and offers anonymous trade and bonus intentions.
-
Controversy: Weex is not regulated by any funded authority with strict standards.
-
Why suspect: There are social media posts complaining about abnormal behavior on exchanges, including frozen accounts and unexplained knowledge of your customer (KYC) issues.
-
What is this: The presence of futures trading, speculative interest in high-up-up opportunities maintains business volume and aggressive promotion keeps running it.
WFF
-
Original: Listed as a platinum sponsor in Tokeen2049, DWF is a sketch market manufacturer, according to Zachxbt, which operates trades on more than 60 exchanges and is attached to high-profile investments. Its background or team is very low.
-
Controversy: This wash may have been included in the list of ZachxBT due to former allegations of market maker and more recent allegations of “Rogg Bridge” from Vite Labs.
-
Why suspect: On March 27, 2025, Vite Labs stated that the DWF market services and its development funds were “rugged” by the decision to remove the project.
-
What is this: The conference surrounds sponsorship, publicity stories and speculative propaganda around the listing keeps the minimum business interest alive.
Bitunix
-
Original: Established around 2021, butunix is a crypto exclusion registered in St. Vincent and Grenadines. It provides spots and futures trading.
-
Controversy: The “sketch” is labeled by Zachxbt, which is probable to attract South Korea’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), which is part of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) to prove services to Korean customers without necessary registration.
-
Why suspect: Limited regulatory inspection and a vague corporate structure weakens the trust.
-
What is this: trading volume
Do you know Firm valid smart contracts such as Certik or Hacken Audit. Many sketch coins claim “internal audit” or simply leave them, highlighting users to unpopular or exploitation.
Previous examples of sketch projects presented as sponsors
Here are two cases when shady crypto provisrs have been sponsors of major events, only to use the credibility they earned to live investors:
JPX
In Singapore in Tokeen2049, JPEX contributed a platinum sponsor to $ 70,000 to Becoma, using it to look valid. However, after Hong Kong regulators issued a warning in mid -September 2023, JPEX left both of them and disappeared from the incident by the second day.
Shortly after, the Excment stopped the return, charged high fees of 999 USDT (USDT) on 1,000-USDT transactions and faced complaints on Thursday, alleging that it is accused of predicting and operating with a laicense. Officials damaged several individuals, deposition and approximate investors in more than 1 billion Hong Kong dollars.
Hypervers
Hypervers hosted grand promotional programs including a $ 3,500-person party on a $ 40 million Charges Megaila in Florida, which featured Wrapped Rick Ross, to present themselves as a prestigious crypto and metavors platform. This has claimed to have developed the “right virtual world” and promises daily returns to attract investors worldwide.
However, US regulators later revealed that Hypervers were a Ponzi scheme that cheated investors worth about $ 1.89 billion. The major promoters, Steven Lewis and Brenda Chunga were the channels to run a fake pyramid scheme by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
Do you know Some shady coins use bots to create fake trading volumes and rank trick platform intesto. You need to make reservation well before investing.
What should novice traders see
For those new people for cryptocurrency, identifying suspicious coins can prevent financial loss and stress. When evaluating cryptocurrency, there are important factors to consider here:
-
Research on the history of team and project: Watch warning signals such as anonymous founders, repeatedly ribrands or lack of iconic partnership.
-
Evaluate marketing strategy: Be cautious with coins promoted through aggressive marketing, including meme-driven social media, influence endors or unrealistic claims such as “Gurntade 100X Returns”.
-
Assess liquidity: Low tracking volumes or focused coins are price manipulation by interiors.
-
Check the tokenomics: For extremely large token token supplies, obscure tokening processes or allocation such as red flags in favor of internal formulas, which may indicate price manipulation or risks of scams.
-
Verify the exchange listing: There may be a lack of transparency in coins performed only on low or poor regulated exchanges.
-
Check the previous issues: Do research on any history of problems, such as return, scam or regulator warning.
-
Use indirect equipment and diverse: varied: Avoid relying on a fully influencer or trending chart. Institute, use onchain analytics to monitor wallet activity and use diverse investments to limit risk.
Shady coins of the Act as a warning rather than actual investment opportunities. They attract investors with large -scale profits promises, but they naturally addition -on plans, vague team backgrounds and weak basic things. Despite continuous market accidents or disputes, these coins remain due to unpredictable, community-operated nature of crypto markets.
There are no investment advice or recommendations in this article. Every investment and trading film includes risk, and readers should do their research while taking decisions.
